The Lahore High Court has dismissed a petition seeking to reduce Punjab’s proposed 10-day Basant celebrations in 2027 to a single day, after the petitioner failed to produce an official notification confirming the festival schedule.
Justice Shahram Sarwar Chaudhry heard the petition filed by citizen Shahid Islam on October 16, 2026.
According to media reports on the proceedings, the judge questioned how the court could examine the legality of the proposed celebrations without an official document establishing the government’s decision.
The court directed the petitioner to file a fresh petition with the relevant notification. The dismissal was therefore linked to the missing document, rather than a final judicial determination of the safety concerns raised in the case.
Why the Basant 2027 Plan Was Challenged
The petition challenged the proposed Basant schedule of January 29 to February 7, 2027, and asked the court to declare the announcement invalid or restrict the celebrations to one day.
The petitioner argued that extending kite-flying activities over 10 days could increase the risk of accidents and injuries. The concerns cited included cuts from kite strings, electric shocks and falls from rooftops, along with noise and environmental pollution.
The petition also alleged that 17 people died during Basant celebrations in 2026. That figure was presented as part of the petitioner’s case and should not be treated as a finding made by the court in this proceeding.
The petitioner maintained that the proposed duration could threaten public safety and infringe upon citizens’ fundamental rights. However, the court’s reported decision focused on the absence of an official notification confirming the schedule under challenge.

Court Questions Missing Official Notification
During the hearing, Justice Chaudhry asked the petitioner’s counsel whether an official notification had been submitted to establish the 10-day schedule.
According to reports published after the hearing, the judge observed that the court could not issue an order solely on the basis of information available on a website. Without an official document, the court could not properly assess whether the proposed arrangements violated fundamental rights.
The court also questioned why the registrar’s office had not raised an objection before the petition was placed for hearing. Media reports said the judge asked the petitioner’s counsel why a fine should not be imposed, although the reported outcome was a direction to submit a fresh petition with the relevant notification.
The Punjab government and several senior officials had been named as respondents, including the chief secretary, home secretary, deputy commissioner, inspector general of police and Lahore’s capital city police officer.
What the Decision Means for Basant 2027
The court’s reported decision does not amount to a ruling that the proposed 10-day celebrations are safe, nor does it settle the petitioner’s claims about possible violations of fundamental rights.
Instead, the petitioner has been directed to provide the official notification needed to support a fresh legal challenge. Any further proceedings will depend on whether the required document is submitted and how the court handles the matter.
The government’s final arrangements, including the duration of the celebrations and applicable safety measures, should be assessed against official notifications and subsequent court orders.
For now, the petition has been dismissed in its current form, with the court leaving the petitioner the option of approaching it again with the required documentation.
