What is India’s new controversial citizenship law? In a move that has sparked controversy and drawn criticism from rights activists and opposition leaders, the Indian government has announced the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), which notably excludes Muslims from its provisions.
The decision, timed just ahead of the upcoming General Elections, has reignited debate over the intentions and implications of the CAA, which was passed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi‘s government in 2019.
Under the provisions of the CAA, non-Muslim refugees from neighboring countries such as Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan are eligible for Indian citizenship if they belong to specific religious communities, including Hindus, Parsis, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, and Christians, and fled to India before December 31, 2014.
However, Muslims are notably excluded from this eligibility, leading to concerns of discrimination and marginalization within India’s diverse population.
Also read: PM Modi signs trans-continental trade pact with UAE
The announcement of the enforcement of rules for the CAA comes after significant delays due to widespread protests and unrest following its initial passage.
Government officials maintain that the CAA is intended to provide refuge and citizenship to persecuted minorities from neighboring nations and dismiss allegations of religious discrimination.
They emphasize that the law does not seek to revoke citizenship from any individual, but rather to grant it to eligible refugees.
According to a spokesperson from the Home Ministry, the implementation of regulations for the CAA will enable eligible individuals to apply for Indian citizenship through a designated online portal.
However, Muslim groups and rights activists remain apprehensive about the potential ramifications of the CAA, particularly in conjunction with proposed initiatives such as the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
There are fears that these measures could disproportionately affect India’s Muslim population, potentially leading to statelessness for those lacking proper documentation.
Opposition leaders, including members of the Congress party, have strongly criticized the CAA, arguing that it undermines the secular principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
Shashi Tharoor, a prominent Congress leader, denounced the law as a “communal exercise” that threatens to divide the country along religious lines.
As the government moves forward with the implementation of the CAA, the debate over its implications for India’s secular identity and the rights of its minority communities continues to intensify, setting the stage for further political and social discourse in the lead-up to the General Elections.
India’s new controversial citizenship law
India’s parliament earlier passed the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB), sparking widespread debate and protests across the country.
The bill, proposed by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), offers citizenship to religious minorities from neighboring Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan.
The CAB seeks to amend India’s 64-year-old Citizenship law, which currently prohibits illegal migrants from obtaining citizenship.
Under the new bill, members of minority communities including Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians from the specified countries can apply for citizenship after residing in India for six years, down from the previous 11-year requirement.
However, the bill has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters. Critics argue that by excluding Muslims from its provisions, the bill violates India’s secular principles enshrined in the constitution.
They contend that citizenship should not be tied to religion, and the bill discriminates against Muslims, undermining the country’s secular fabric.
Supporters of the bill, including senior BJP leaders, defend it as a necessary measure to protect persecuted minorities in neighboring Islamic countries.
They assert that India cannot accept illegal migration and that the exclusion of Muslims is justified given the religious persecution faced by minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan.
The controversy has led to widespread protests, particularly in the northeast states of India, where concerns about demographic changes due to immigration from Bangladesh are prevalent.
Additionally, the bill’s exclusion of Muslims and its focus on specific religious groups have drawn criticism internationally, raising concerns about India’s commitment to secularism and religious freedom.
The passage of the Citizenship Amendment Bill reflects deeper tensions within Indian society regarding identity, religion, and citizenship.
As the debate continues, the bill’s implications for India’s secular fabric and constitutional values remain a subject of intense scrutiny and discussion.
