US rejects involvement in Sheikh Hasina’s ouster

US rejects involvement in Sheikh Hasina's ouster
This content has been archived. It may no longer be relevant. For the latest news, click: theasianmirror.com/

US rejects involvement in Sheikh Hasina’s ouster.

The United States has categorically rejected allegations of alleged involvement in the ouster of former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who recently fled the country after resigning from her position following massive student protests.

“We have had no involvement at all. Any reports or rumours that the US government was involved in these events is simply false,” White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre said at a press briefing, Reuters reported.

Earlier on Sunday, Hasina blamed the US of playing a key role in toppling her government as they want to control Bangladesh’s Saint Martin Island in the Bay of Bengal, as mentioned in a report in the Economic Times.

Moreover, the report highlighted that the former Bangladesh PM conveyed that message through her close associates.

Hasina’s son, Sajeeb Wazed, wrote in a post on X on Sunday, that her mother never made such statement.

“We believe that the Bangladeshi people should determine the future of the Bangladeshi government and that’s where we stand,” Jean-Pierre said.

Also read: “Heartbroken that i can’t see, Hug her”: Sheikh Hasina’s daughter

Following Hasinas resignation from the position, an interim government was formed, led by Nobel Peace laureate Dr Muhammad Yunus, with the aim of holding elections in the country.

Bangladesh was engulfed by protests and violence after student protests last month against quotas that reserved a high portion of government jobs for certain groups escalated into a campaign to oust Hasina.

Hasina had won a fourth straight term in January in an election that the opposition boycotted and which the US State Department said was not free and fair.

As US rejects involvement in Sheikh Hasina’s ouster, Hasina reached New Delhi after leaving Bangladesh, ending her continuous rule of 15 years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *